THE CRUNCH
An early Geekbench 7 run on AMD's EPYC 9996, a 256-core Zen 6c server chip, has been compared directly against a Ryzen 7 9700X by the Russian enthusiast known as "three twenty six" (@326powah), with the result spotted by leaker HXL (@9550pro). With both CPUs clocked at 4.1 GHz, the EPYC scored 2847 single-threaded in Linux on a Dell PowerEdge R9815, against 2483 for the desktop chip in Linux and 2318 in Windows. Per-test gains over Zen 5 ranged up to 24% in the HTML5 Browser test, with 19% in asset compression, 21% in video encoding and 17% in photo editing, and no regressions in the Linux results.
Some of that gap may come from configuration rather than architecture. The EPYC 9996 packs 1GB of L3 cache across eight "Monarch" CCDs and a 1024-bit memory bus, while the Ryzen 7 9700X has 32MB of L3 and ordinary DDR5. The browser test, which is sensitive to memory latency, could easily be flattered by the server chip's enormous cache. But the compression, encoding and editing gains are harder to dismiss as setup mismatch.
Notably, Geekbench makes relatively light use of SIMD instructions, and this test is marked AVX2, so it is not exercising the AVX-512 units in either CPU. Most of the tests instead measure integer arithmetic and memory subsystem performance, which makes Zen 6's lead here more interesting than a raw number-crunching result.
Caveats remain. The widely reported "15% IPC increase" figure is not established, and the EPYC 9996 uses Zen 6c, AMD's dense, area-efficient core design that trades peak clock headroom for packing density, so it is not the core desktop buyers will get. Still, after Zen 5's modest gains over Zen 4, an early sign of a real architectural jump, with rumours of a large clock uplift on top, is promising for Zen 6's desktop debut.
Side by side
EPYC 9996 vs Ryzen 7 9700X: Geekbench 7 single-thread and specs
| EPYC 9996 | Ryzen 7 9700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 7 single-thread | 2847 | 2483 |
| L3 cache | 1GB | 32MB |
| Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
With both CPUs clocked at 4.1 GHz
Details from Tom's Hardware, as quoted in this brief.


